中国高校科技期刊研究会第9次会员代表大会在北京召开，中宣部出版局副局长张怀海、教育部科学技术与信息化司一级巡视员张国辉等领导出席会议并发表..
英文简介：Global governance or world governance is a movement towards political cooperation among transnational actors, aimed at negotiating responses to problems that affect more than one state or region. Institutions of global governance—the United Nations, the International Criminal Court, the World Bank, etc.—tend to have limited or demarcated power to enforce compliance. The modern question of world governance exists in the context of globalization and globalizing regimes of power: politically, economically and culturally. In response to the acceleration of worldwide interdependence, both between human societies and between humankind and the biosphere, the term "global governance" may name the process of designating laws, rules, or regulations intended for a global scale. Global governance is not a singular system. There is no "world government" but the many different regimes of global governance do have commonalities: While the contemporary system of global political relations is not integrated, the relation between the various regimes of global governance is not insignificant, and the system does have a common dominant organizational form. The dominant mode of organization today is bureaucratic rational—regularized, codified and rational. It is common to all modern regimes of political power and frames the transition from classical sovereignty to what David Held describes as the second regime of sovereignty—liberal international sovereignty.中文简介：（来自Google、百度翻译）全球治理或世界治理是跨国行动者之间进行政治合作的运动，旨在就影响多个国家或地区的问题进行谈判。全球治理机构——联合国、国际刑事法院、世界银行等——往往拥有有限或划界的权力来强制执行合规。现代世界治理问题存在于全球化和权力制度全球化的背景下：政治、经济和文化。为了应对人类社会之间以及人类与生物圈之间全球相互依赖的加速，“全球治理”一词可以命名为旨在全球规模的法律、规则或法规的过程。 全球治理不是一个单一的系统。没有“世界政府”，但全球治理的许多不同制度确实具有共性： 虽然当代全球政治关系体系并不完整，但全球治理的各种制度之间的关系并不微不足道，而且这种制度具有共同的主导组织形式。今天组织的主导模式是官僚理性的规范化、法典化和理性化。这是所有现代政权的共同点，并构成了从古典主权向大卫所描述的第二个主权自由国际主权的过渡。
